Does it matter of an historical drama is factually incorrect? I thought about this after a recent viewing of the Netflix drama The Dig. I enjoyed the film, was swept up in the emotion and mood of the piece, especially the misty views of the Suffolk coast. Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes turned in bravura performances as landowner Edith Pretty and excavator Basil Brown as they uncovered an historically significant archaelogical find. Afterward, curious about what I'd seen, I went online and did some digging of a different sort to find out more about these figures and the others depicted in the film.
It's no secret Edith Pretty was 21 years older than Mulligan at the time she is depicted in the film. Equally, supporting characters' ages have also been changed and this has prompted some Twitter rage. The Dig is an adaptation of a novel based on actual events, so there is some leeway for depictions. We can all speculate why the producers could not find a 56-year old actress to portray Pretty, while having no trouble finding a 50-something to portray Brown. Indeed. I suppose for people like me who had no knowledge of the Sutton Hoo find the film more than justified the factual errors by bringing to light the personages of Pretty and Brown for us to appreciate. After all, Brown was lost to history, as the British Museum which took over the treasure erased his name from the record. The Dig at least restores some credit to both of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment